Read the 300-page NIT before it reads your team's week.
Upload the tender document and get a clause-by-clause account of what it actually asks for — eligibility, technical requirements, scoring rules, deadlines, obligations — with a Bid / No-Bid call and a checklist the bid team can work from immediately.
- A Bid / No-Bid call backed by an eligibility matrix, not a hunch
- Clause-by-clause compliance checklist with an owner per row
- Every addendum traced back to the clauses it actually changes
- A deadline tracker that sends the warning before it's too late to matter
The problem today
The disqualifying clause is always on page 240.
Someone spends three days inside a 300-page NIT before finding the eligibility clause that rules the company out, the margin-killing term buried in the fine print, or the timeline nobody flagged as unrealistic. The finding is real — it just arrives after the effort that should have been spent deciding whether to bid at all.
Eligibility and disqualifying clauses hide in plain text, indistinguishable from the surrounding boilerplate until someone reads carefully enough to notice.
Scoring formulas (QCBS, L1) and the obligations attached to them get skimmed under deadline pressure — and skimmed is exactly when they matter most.
An addendum lands three days before submission and changes a requirement the team already answered, and nobody notices until the answer is wrong.
How it works
From raw documents to a defensible decision.
Upload the NIT
Drop in the tender or RFP document — a long CPWD, ONGC, GeM, or private NIT included.
Analyse clauses
Every clause is read: eligibility, technical requirements, scoring weights, timelines, and obligations.
Build the matrix
An eligibility matrix and a clause-by-clause compliance checklist are generated with owners per row.
Decide with sign-off
A Bid / No-Bid recommendation with a capability-gap report, governed by multi-approver sign-off.
Capabilities
Everything the workflow needs — in one place.
Clause extraction
Eligibility, technical, commercial, and compliance clauses pulled from long NIT and RFP documents.
Eligibility matrix
A structured eligibility read so a disqualifier surfaces in minutes, not on day three.
Compliance checklist
A clause-by-clause checklist with an owner and status per row for the bid team.
Bid / No-Bid workflow
A recommendation with a capability-gap report against each scoring criterion.
RFI & clarifications
Pre-bid questions and the issuing authority's answers tracked with their own deadlines and status.
Addendum impact
When an addendum lands, see which clauses, checklist rows, and responses must be reconfirmed.
Deadline tracking
Submission deadlines tracked with a pre-submission alert schedule so nothing is missed.
Multi-approver sign-off
The bid decision carries a formal, governed approval trail across the people who must agree.
Under the hood
Built for teams that get audited.
Governance is not a bolt-on. Every decision is traceable to the document, the model, and the person who approved it.
- Analysis runs as durable background jobs with crash recovery — a long NIT will not lose progress.
- Clauses link to their source location in the document for verification.
- A compliance matrix tracks status so nothing sits half-answered.
- Addendum re-confirmation identifies exactly what changed and who must revisit it.
- Bid decisions carry an approval trail with separation of duties.
- Per-tenant AI policy: local-only, approved external, or disabled.
- Every action written to a hash-chained, tamper-evident audit log.
- Positioned as bid-management assistance for your team — not an external e-submission portal.
bid qualification — was 3 days
checklist with owners
addenda tracked to clauses
One platform
The same engine also handles this.
DocIQ is a single product — the extraction, evidence, and approval machinery on this page runs underneath these too.
Decide to bid — or not — before the team loses the week to it.
Upload a live NIT and get an eligibility read and a Bid / No-Bid recommendation before you commit anyone's time.